Building Name - NPPR Residence Hall
Location - Swarthmore College; Swarthmore, Pennsylvania
Occupancy/Function - Residential, Resisdence Hall
Building Size - 49,000 SF
Number of Stories - 5 Above Grade; 6 Total
Project Team
Owner - Swarthmore College
Architect - Digsau
Structural - CVM Engineers
MEP - Bruce E. Brooks & Associates
Civil - Langan Engineering
Sustainability & LEED - Revision Architecture
Landscape Architect - Studio Bryan Hanes
Lighting - Beam LTD
Fire Protection - Jensen Hughes Engineering
Cost Estimator - International Consultants, Inc.
Project Delivery Method - Single Prime Contract
Codes - 2009 ICC, FHA, 2010 ADA Standards, ASHRAE 2009 62.1 & 90.1
The NPPR Residence Hall is a 5 story residential building meant to house students at Swarthmore College. It consists of three main structures, each cube-shaped (aptly labelled as Cube A, B, and C) and joined by a common lobby at ground level. Part of the exterior facade is connected to the baseball field next to the site. Subsequent levels 2 and 3 also contain common corridors connecting the three structures. Level 4 contains Cube A and Cube B only and Level 5 consists of Cube B only. Each of the roofs of the structures supports an air handling unit which supplies air to its part of the building. These are surrounded by photo-voltaic systems on each of the roofs, which supply electricity to the building and add to the sustainable features of the building. The main heating and cooling of the building is carried out by valence units on each floor. These are supplied by a hydronic system connected to the basement, which only exists within Cube B and houses the boilers and heat pumps. Connected to these are a number of geothermal wells on site which help supply heat to the system.
Note: While great efforts have been taken to provide accurate and complete information on the pages of CPEP, please be aware that the information contained herewith is considered a work‐in progress for this thesis project. Modifications and changes related to the original building designs and construction methodologies for this senior thesis project are solely the interpretation of Christopher Ankeny. Changes and discrepancies in no way imply that the original design contained errors or was flawed. Differing assumptions, code references, requirements, and methodologies have been incorporated into this thesis project; therefore, investigation results may vary from the original design.